Kajal Agarwal New Latest Topless Photoshoot for FHM

You've read the drama - FHM India had a Kajal Agarwal on the cover. Kajal claimed it wasn't her; FHM says it was and they have the raw images to prove it. 

ETA: Well, I've been scolded by a professional photographer who says these aren't them. These must just be the "normal" lad mag fashion images. TOTALLY my misunderstanding. (Sorry!!)

BUT it still raises some questions - why did Kajal pose for FHM in the first place, even if not topless? She must have known the type of thing they would have her do, which is always pretty skanky, even if not topless per se. And the mystery of the photoshopped topless cover will remain a mystery... who is telling the truth? (Besides me, of course...)

A couple more pics under the cut... It's a typical lad mag spread but Kajal gives it a little oomph.

The Britney Spears Rolling Stone cover pose...

AND HOW TINY IS THAT WAIST?! OH MY GOD!